4 ms·
I would love to see these stats for sfgate.com and sfchronicle.com. Both of them are infested with so much added fluff. It's frustrating because I pay for a sub
by s1mon 4y ago
I would love to see these stats for sfgate.com and sfchronicle.com. Both of them are infested with so much added fluff. It's frustrating because I pay for a subscription to SFChronicle (and NYTimes), but unless I want to install adblocking, the experience of trying to read the news is often so user hostile, even on a fast connection and fast computer.
- bradgessler 4y agoYou can run those pages through speed reports at https://pagespeed.web.dev https://pagespeed.web.dev I don't include in the rankings because their distribution isn't wide enough, but I'd guess they're relatively slow for the reasons you mention.