3 ms·

I struggle to come up with something that can unite, say, California and Alabama other than a credible external threat. Their paths seems to be quite divergent

I struggle to come up with something that can unite, say, California and Alabama other than a credible external threat. Their paths seems to be quite divergent at this point.

greenie_beans 4y ago
that's incredibly dismissive of alabamians who fight for progressive issues in the state. it's also harmful to the folks who suffer under the political hegemony.
- deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]
- hattmall 4y ago
  It's also ignoring the large number of Californians moving to Alabama. The fact is California is too big to generalize and that's true of most states. The schism between individuals views in Alabama internally is no less than the perceived difference between views of California and Alabama as states.
  - jleyank 4y ago
    No, but the pertinence of each “side” of views is way different. Whole lot of frustrated farmers in California who are dominated by the big cities. Probably a similar percentage of blue Alabama folks dominated by the Red sea. Generational change is required to alter the non-purple states and it’s not worth the effort for most people to try. Move to where the political climate is congruent with one’s philosophy is far easier.
    - greenie_beans 4y ago
      that's definitely a take. as somebody who is in the political minority, i often feel like giving up. but i also think that giving up is the wrong thing to do.
asguy 4y ago
What do you need to unite them about? Unless Alabama is imposing something untenable on California, what does California care? It can keep being California. You're not going to unite France and Germany on everything either. But you don't have to. They just have to agree to let each other keep being France and Germany.
- jleyank 4y ago
  Gee, I don't know. How they handle women's rights, how they handle marriage rights, ... These things aren't state-level actions.
  - asguy 4y ago
    The US supreme court seems to disagree with you.
- dragonwriter 4y ago
  > Unless Alabama is imposing something untenable on California, what does California care? Because California’s economy is forcibly diverted to subsidize Alabama's political decisions (given the way federal funding formulas work, largely specifically because those decisions are consistent failures in aggregate economic terms.) Also, because being conmpelled to tolerate denials of fundamental human rights is an intolerable condition.
  - asguy 4y ago
    > Because California’s economy is forcibly diverted to subsidize Alabama's political decisions (given the way federal funding formulas work, largely specifically because those decisions are consistent failures in aggregate economic terms.) I agree. I think that the way the US does things is kind of ridiculous. > Also, because being conmpelled to tolerate denials of fundamental human rights is an intolerable condition. How do you feel about the US not managing it's own petroleum production at levels to support its own use, effectively requiring propping up the Saudi regime? I think we can safely say they have a worse track record on women's rights than Alabama. Do you feel that's intolerable as well?

I struggle to come up with something that can unite, say, California and Alabama other than a credible external threat. Their paths seems to be quite divergent at this point.

greenie_beans 4y ago

that's incredibly dismissive of alabamians who fight for progressive issues in the state. it's also harmful to the folks who suffer under the political hegemony.

deleted 4y ago
[deleted]
hattmall 4y ago
It's also ignoring the large number of Californians moving to Alabama. The fact is California is too big to generalize and that's true of most states. The schism between individuals views in Alabama internally is no less than the perceived difference between views of California and Alabama as states.
- jleyank 4y ago
  No, but the pertinence of each “side” of views is way different. Whole lot of frustrated farmers in California who are dominated by the big cities. Probably a similar percentage of blue Alabama folks dominated by the Red sea. Generational change is required to alter the non-purple states and it’s not worth the effort for most people to try. Move to where the political climate is congruent with one’s philosophy is far easier.
  - greenie_beans 4y ago
    that's definitely a take. as somebody who is in the political minority, i often feel like giving up. but i also think that giving up is the wrong thing to do.

asguy 4y ago

What do you need to unite them about? Unless Alabama is imposing something untenable on California, what does California care? It can keep being California. You're not going to unite France and Germany on everything either. But you don't have to. They just have to agree to let each other keep being France and Germany.

jleyank 4y ago
Gee, I don't know. How they handle women's rights, how they handle marriage rights, ... These things aren't state-level actions.
- asguy 4y ago
  The US supreme court seems to disagree with you.
dragonwriter 4y ago
> Unless Alabama is imposing something untenable on California, what does California care? Because California’s economy is forcibly diverted to subsidize Alabama's political decisions (given the way federal funding formulas work, largely specifically because those decisions are consistent failures in aggregate economic terms.) Also, because being conmpelled to tolerate denials of fundamental human rights is an intolerable condition.
- asguy 4y ago
  > Because California’s economy is forcibly diverted to subsidize Alabama's political decisions (given the way federal funding formulas work, largely specifically because those decisions are consistent failures in aggregate economic terms.) I agree. I think that the way the US does things is kind of ridiculous. > Also, because being conmpelled to tolerate denials of fundamental human rights is an intolerable condition. How do you feel about the US not managing it's own petroleum production at levels to support its own use, effectively requiring propping up the Saudi regime? I think we can safely say they have a worse track record on women's rights than Alabama. Do you feel that's intolerable as well?