Hmmmm...I'm not from the U.K., but reading the article, it appears that he was told to stop using sound amplifying equipment. In fact, he says that he thinks p

Hmmmm...I'm not from the U.K., but reading the article, it appears that he was told to stop using sound amplifying equipment. In fact, he says that he thinks protests should be "noisy and disruptive", which I suppose they often are, but if I lived or worked anywhere near there I'd be calling that harassment or unsafe working conditions (stress) if it went on day after day. Now, if they let people blast music day after day at that same spot, and don't let people use sound amplification equipment for protest, then I suppose there are grounds for complaint.