Yeah, there's kind of a fuzzy line between "rural" and "remote" or whatever. I expect quite a few people would like to get "out of the city" to some extent, but

Yeah, there's kind of a fuzzy line between "rural" and "remote" or whatever. I expect quite a few people would like to get "out of the city" to some extent, but I'm not sure how many of them long to live in, say, a remote part of Montana, hundreds of miles from much of anything aside from farms and cattle. It seems like there's a "sweet spot" that is "just rural enough" while still being close enough to a city to allow the occasional trip when it's needed. Those areas will probably continue to boom for a while.