3 ms·
FB does not provide enough value to actually pay for it. > In all seriousness, I'm asking myself this question for a decade or so Are you in a decision-making
by 2143 4y ago
FB does not provide enough value to actually pay for it.
> In all seriousness, I'm asking myself this question for a decade or so
Are you in a decision-making position at FB? If not, then in all seriousness it's pointless.
This might partially work in USA maybe, but it won't in other places.
For example India alone has 340 million FB users, which is greater than the population of USA. As an Indian, I bet not a single one of them would be willing to pay. FB probably wouldn't want to risk loosing them.
(I got the numbers from googling).
(I'm not on FB).
- muzani 4y agoWhatsApp might be a good model to compare against. Americans paid for it and it never really took off in the US. Rest of world had it free and it still dominates. A lot of people want to avoid WhatsApp because you're really just paying with personal information. But until there's a real barrier, it'll be around.