This is a very naive and unconstructive point of view. Interviewers have an interest to screen for the best quality with the least effort. If they can reduce f

This is a very naive and unconstructive point of view. Interviewers have an interest to screen for the best quality with the least effort. If they can reduce false negatives, they could fill positions more quickly. If there's a concensus a particular method is always better than asking for leetcode hards in 30 minutes, companies are likely to adopt it. Companies that adopt better practices perform better, and hopefully there's less time spent by people on practising leetcoding and more time spent on more productive activities. Nothing would be done if these conversations are not had. Many fail to make a difference, but sometimes something good comes out of it. You should learn to have some humility that many privileges that you currently enjoy are won by people who care and try and you should not shut them down. And as a practical matter, industry insiders do read these complaints. Sure, it's hard to make big companies change what they do. But companies do adapt. Many small companies adopted alternative practices that are less heavy on leetcode and hire well. With some time and effort, maybe big companies would change too, and we could all be better off.