3 ms·
> Because WebKit sucks! Of course it doesn't suck > the status quo of rendering engines. You have Blink And so we've immediately arrived at the core of the m
by dmitriid 4y ago
> Because WebKit sucks!
Of course it doesn't suck
> the status quo of rendering engines. You have Blink
And so we've immediately arrived at the core of the matter: all you want is Chrome. Which is a) the dominant browser and b) whose "capable" is a bunch of Chrome-only non-standards
- mtomweb 4y agoI assume you’ve never even attempted to build an app for Safari? Or a Web App at all?
- smoldesu 4y agoI wouldn't complain if Apple let me install the things I want on the device I own. If Apple let me use browsers that had the featureset I wanted, I wouldn't detract from Safari so much. As it stands though, the only sane way to deliver an app to iOS is via the web. Anything else is just a ploy for 30% of my profits and an attempt to Stockholm-syndrome me into becoming an iOS developer. So yeah, I'm willing to stick it to Apple for being the largest company in the world, and criminally negligent towards their first-party browser. Obviously they're doing this because they directly profit off the failure of the web.
- dmitriid 4y ago> Anything else is just a ploy for 30% of my profits and an attempt to Stockholm-syndrome me into becoming an iOS developer. Have you ever tried developing for consoles or releasing games through Steam? It's probably "but it's different"? > and criminally negligent towards their first-party browser. And that "criminal negligence" manifests itself in not implementing all of Chrome's non-standards the moment Chrome comes up with them?