5 ms·
Don't you believe that the physical owner of a device should be entitled to complete control of the code that is executed in it? This goes beyond business model
by EMIRELADERO 4y ago
Don't you believe that the physical owner of a device should be entitled to complete control of the code that is executed in it? This goes beyond business models.
- dwaite 4y agoAre you advocating a mode to remove iOS and boot another arbitrary system in its stead?
- tambourine_man 4y agoIt’s the last in my bullet point
- EMIRELADERO 4y agoThat wouldn't achieve the same level of control over the device as Apple. You would still have a locked bootloader and an unaccesible Secure Enclave.
- tambourine_man 4y agoSecure Enclave should remain inaccessible, even to Apple. Bootloader should be doable once you can run unprivileged arbitrary code, but some support could be offered as well, like they do with the M series Macs
- irae 4y agoSo you will be satisfied if Apple provides you with the option to replace iOS by whatever OS you can put there? Apple bundles the three levels (hardware, OS and Apps) and sells you the hardware. But Safari is tied to iOS and not to the hardware itself. So would you argue about an option to replace iOS instead of installing other browsers on iOS itself?
- EMIRELADERO 4y agoYes, if I could have the ability to exert the same level of control over the hardware as Apple (including things such as the Secure Enclave) then it would be the ideal way.