> You are understating the limitations of B+trees for real workloads. I never said anything about workloads. All I said was that your statements about B+Trees

> You are understating the limitations of B+trees for real workloads. I never said anything about workloads. All I said was that your statements about B+Trees having dwindling usage are clearly false. If you make a claim that is self-evidently bogus, then you shouldn't expect anything else that you may have said at the same time to be taken seriously.