> Haskell doesn’t have operators in the classic sense, since they’re just an alternate syntax (infix) for regular functions Actually in Haskell there is a conc

> Haskell doesn’t have operators in the classic sense, since they’re just an alternate syntax (infix) for regular functions Actually in Haskell there is a concept of 'functions' and 'operators'. The former are made up symbols, while the latter are made up mostly alphanumeric characters. Also they parse differently.