> As long as a fair chunk of the profits are channeled to effective altruism causes (which I think is the status quo?) That's one heck of a qualification witho

> As long as a fair chunk of the profits are channeled to effective altruism causes (which I think is the status quo?) That's one heck of a qualification without a citation. The "altruism causes" channeled to would need to somehow outweigh the massive costs in terms of CO2 footprint and the loss of savings/security of an untold number of regular people (your "low-information gamblers") who bought into a big ponzi scheme. They can't be made whole (though society will definitionally pay for the subset who lost a significant portion of their life savings), but seems pretty legit to point a finger at those who scammed them.