> If the approach is so inherently flawed that this result is an inevitability, maybe it deserves to die and be replaced by something else. These are all syste

> If the approach is so inherently flawed that this result is an inevitability, maybe it deserves to die and be replaced by something else. These are all systems and projects created and run by human minds. Nothing is "inevitable" and nothing "deserves" to die. These are just outcomes of choices by users, vendors, and regulators. I think many people here are advocating for choices that would keep some kind of competition to Chrome alive. You seem to be advocating for the opposite. That's not necessarily wrong or bad, but Chrome becoming a total monopoly is not "inevitable" either.