2 ms·
That's true of course. What's interesting to me is that they've decided to pay for this access and visit the links so quickly. It must be pretty expensive or ha
by batch12 4y ago
That's true of course. What's interesting to me is that they've decided to pay for this access and visit the links so quickly. It must be pretty expensive or hard to get if only around two-dozen companies pay for access to the data[0].
[0] https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/06/08/elon-musk-twitter-bot-data/ https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/06/08/elon-mu...
- Aissen 4y agoIt might be that Apple is paying for the firehose as a data-source to bootstrap its search engine. Don't they have one accessible via Siri already ? (I don't follow Apple tech very closely).