4 ms·
The bill is quite a bit toned down from how you described it (afaik). You're talking about the initial version of it, which I thought was absolutely horrible. T
by arockwell 18y ago
The bill is quite a bit toned down from how you described it (afaik). You're talking about the initial version of it, which I thought was absolutely horrible. The version that was voted on today seemed quite a bit better (more oversight, some limits on executive pay, not all the money is paid out at once among other provisions...), but I just think that the core of the bill is simply not a good idea.
- chaostheory 18y agooversight by 2 small committees who can be bought isn't enough oversight - all transactions need to be made available to the public. Not to mention that while payments would be made in installments, there was still no cap.
- arockwell 18y agoThanks, I wasn't too aware of exactly what had changed. I didn't realize that the transactions would not be made available to the public, that seems insane.