3 ms·
Every systemic problem that the oligarchs of a capitalist system dont want to fix the sensible way eventually gets framed as a problem of personal responsibilit
by pydry 4y ago
Every systemic problem that the oligarchs of a capitalist system dont want to fix the sensible way eventually gets framed as a problem of personal responsibility.
* When the first cars started killing people -> make jaywalking a crime.
* When people take on too much credit card debt -> obviously a problem with financial literacy
* When large companies destroy the environment -> if people just recycled more we could save the planet...
* You're broke in 1990 -> why didnt you get a degree?
* you're broke in 2000 with a degree -> why didnt you get a STEM degree?
* you're broke in 2010 with a STEM degree -> why didnt you get a compsci degree?
* You're broke in 2020 with a compsci degree -> tsk you should have done something useful like machine learning.
- romanovcode 4y agoDon't forget the: * Global warming -> Stop using your car and planes * Plastics everywhere -> Just stop using plastic straws and bags, that will fix it!
- pydry 4y agoThis only actually twigged for me when I worked for a large company that was pretty horrible for the environment that kept pushing this canard about everybody doing their bit with recycling. ...i know, i know right... why didnt I just take personal responsibility and not take a job at a horrible company that pollutes? Thats how I could do my bit. Being an environmentalist 5th column is probably the way to go, actually.
- chasd00 4y agoThe plastic straw thing blew my mind. I’m convinced it was a viral marketing ploy by the paper industry. That’s pretty far into conspiracy territory but it makes more sense than the saving the turtles story.
- serpix 4y agoThe answer all along was to invest in index funds starting from age 5.
- pydry 4y agoAccording to the default propaganda model of our society the solution is hard work and taking personal responsibility. According to the investment/FIRE communities and Thomas Piketty's study, yea, you're better off siphoning off taking the fruits of others' work via "the magic of compounding".
- blfr 4y agoYes (and very good comment), but will it still be the answer in 2050? Basically, these things look anti-inductive.
- cs137 4y agoAmen. Personal responsibility is the economic analogue of "thoughts and prayers" whenever a shooting occurs. (Note: conservatives don't actually even pray for anyone, because they're the Elect, and since they're already going to heaven while the rest of us fall into eternal hellfire, why bother?) Except: here it is on us to pray--to them. They won't listen. They'll just laugh. Also: * You're broke in 2030 with a machine learning degree -> you should have been born a robot.
- nonrandomstring 4y ago> * You're broke in 1990 -> why didnt you get a degree? > * you're broke in 2000 with a degree -> why didnt you get a STEM degree? > * you're broke in 2010 with a STEM degree -> why didnt you get a compsci degree? > * You're broke in 2020 with a compsci degree -> tsk you should have done something useful like machine learning. LOL. I like it. reads a bit like "First they came for the..." As a "not broke yet" (by British standards) computer scientist, having jumped all these hoops and many more, I'm just wondering what the next ominous step is? I fear this ends like: You're broke in 2048 with a CS degree, PhD in DSP and a successful research career in signals and systems - because you didn't throw all human values to the wind and join a cabal of psychopathic technical elites hell-bent of subverting the entirety of science and technology to an infantile, omnipotent project of world-domination that ultimately added no value, screwed the entire planet and human race. (and for those also with PhDs in ML/DSP smugly working for the Empire, and thinking "I'm safe", your turn comes when abject obedience is insufficient to save you from the sinking ship)