> But at 6'2" (~1.88m) being under 100Kg can't be "literally unhealthy" Healthiness isn't just a height and weight though, and there is so many other things go

> But at 6'2" (~1.88m) being under 100Kg can't be "literally unhealthy" Healthiness isn't just a height and weight though, and there is so many other things going on. People in these discussion have an image of a "standard" body type, with an "average" type of life, but realistically nobody actually fits that average. From my point of view I, I'm not even sure where the parent poster lives, I assume they are male, but have no idea of their ethnicity, nor age, nor what their life looks like. Depending on their exact circumstances, losing more than 10% of the body weight could have more detrimental effects than benefits (it could be "literally unhealthy") > Arnold Schwarzenegger was 6'2" and 107Kg [0] in competitions. Imagine he loses some muscle and gets 10kg of fat here and there. That would put him at probably 20% body fat perhaps ? He'd look sloppy as hell, but I don't think it would be a morbid body in medical terms.