4 ms·
Frankly I thought the opposite. It was a cogent breakdown of the flawed reasoning upon which then original author’s premise lies.
by teakettle42 4y ago
Frankly I thought the opposite.
It was a cogent breakdown of the flawed reasoning upon which then original author’s premise lies.
- adamrezich 4y agothank you—it's disappointing that trying to get people to articulate why they feel a certain way about something is met with such pushback. the parent comment to yours is especially baffling—I can't imagine publicly telling someone that what they've written is "gross" without being able to directly explain why, because that just seems unjustly offensive to me. as an amateur Internet ethnographer I have theories about the pathology of course, but there's no point in sharing them here.