> All they meant when they said they were “true devops” was that they were doing their own ops work. Why were they doing it this way? > I had spent years tryin

> All they meant when they said they were “true devops” was that they were doing their own ops work. Why were they doing it this way? > I had spent years trying to bring the developers to the table and own their operational overhead. Is it me, or does the author question his own goal? Aren’t they exactly owning their own operations? > Let’s try SoftOps. Eh, let’s stick to DevOps.