3 ms·
This is victim blaming. Whether or not he could have been more careful is not an excuse for GPT-3. Illegal behaviour still should be (1) illegal even if the vic
by Beldin 4y ago
This is victim blaming. Whether or not he could have been more careful is not an excuse for GPT-3. Illegal behaviour still should be (1) illegal even if the victim could have done more.
(1) I seem to remember a court case somewhere on the planet in the last months where lack of resistance was deemed indicative of consensual intercourse. Which is not even remotely acceptable. But I digress.
- lanterk 4y agoWhat illegal behaviour? GPT-3 is only spitting out public data. Its like blaming someone taking photo of a road for the photo including some random person.
- Beldin 4y agoTo the best of my knowledge: GDPR has no exception for public data. If you have PII, you need a reason. Consent is a reason; "needed for the requested business" (eg. home address for online shops) is a reason. "Having fun with autogenerating sentences"... doesn't seem like one.