3 ms·
This and the W6H are what I tell any new developer to include when briefing their efforts to clients or management. The W6H overlaps the Heilmeier Catechism so
by Communitivity 4y ago
This and the W6H are what I tell any new developer to include when briefing their efforts to clients or management.
The W6H overlaps the Heilmeier Catechism some:
- Who: Who will perform the work?
- What: What work will be performed?
- Where: Where will the work be performed? Is the env. suitable or are purchases needed? If purchases, what?
- Why: Why are you/we the people to perform this work? Why does this work need to be performed? Why are we not using an off-the-shelf solution (this is where you can present an Analysis of Alternatives and/or Gap Analysis)?
- When: When will the work start? When is it expected to end? When is it needed and what is it needed by?
- Which: Which customer are you performing the work for?
- How: What are your planned methods, at a highlevel, and reasoning behind those choices?
The original source for the above is Aristotle, but thanks to Wikipedia [1] I've always thought the way I use them to more match Hermagoras of Temnos, as quoted in pseudo-Augustine's De Rhetorica[2]:
Quis, quid, quando, ubi, cur, quem ad modum, quibus adminiculis.[3]
(Who, what, when, where, why, in what way, by what means)
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Ws https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Ws
[2] Cecil W. Wooten, George Alexander Kennedy, eds., The orator in action and theory in Greece and Rome, 2001. ISBN 90-04-12213-3, p. 36.
[3] Robertson, D.W. Jr (1946). "A Note on the Classical Origin of "Circumstances" in the Medieval Confessional". Studies in Philology. 43 (1): 6–14. JSTOR 4172741.
- no_identd 4y agoHere's one more highly relevant citation into which I eventually stumbled, which covers additional details about the W6H: https://www.academia.edu/29682686/The_Roots_of_News_in_Journalism https://www.academia.edu/29682686/The_Roots_of_News_in_Journ... Stamenković, Gordana — "The Roots of News in Journalism.", Unpublished Manuscript, 2016. Plus additional see also, the recent Hacker News thread on How To improve one's Technical Writing, the link to which I'll ninja-edit-insert here in a second: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31859040#31877184 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31859040#31877184 In my opinion, historically, the decisions which led to IBM's Zachman Framework only utilizing W5H(=6 questions) instead of W6H (=7 questions) really screwed us all over by whole freightloads more than almost anyone realizes as it has horribly miscalibrated more societal systems(') environments with ground truth biasing so extensively that it has started to slip into recursive, some sort of eldritch generalization of xkcd's Citogenesis cycle.