3 ms·

This seems logical from first principles. What hard evidence do we have to confirm this is the case?

• logicalmonster 4y ago
  > hard evidence Most people in the business are smart. And smart people generally don't line up to be explicit about manipulating the market and committing possible crimes when it can come back to bite them. Luckily, despite his best attempts to remove many copies of this video from the Internet, we have Jim Cramer on deck. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIfixbq_u0Q https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIfixbq_u0Q https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8RkqzRs95Sc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8RkqzRs95Sc Also, as a general rule, it just pays to understand the following: > With few exceptions, the entire media is shit and barely understands the topics they cover. It is easy for smart people to manipulate them. > Access journalism is widely practiced. > There's literally millions/billions/trillions of dollars at stake. In this environment, it's close to a complete metaphysical certainty that media manipulation to profit occurs.