3 ms·
TLDR is start with strong authoritarian state capacity and violently bring order to social fabric and build industrial/extractive base while ingratiating powerf
by dirtyid 4y ago
TLDR is start with strong authoritarian state capacity and violently bring order to social fabric and build industrial/extractive base while ingratiating powerful hegemons / neighbours, or certainly not piss them off. Ultimately, those with wealth and power get to pick winners and losers. Nascent democracies tend to be developmental death sentences - can't coordinate. It will likely involve extreme state violence.
Less viable Asian Tiger export driven route:
-Be authoritarian.
-Establish domestic serenity via state violence.
-Have maritime access.
-Be geopolitically strategic to US interests at heigh of hegemony.
-Align as satraps and be subsidized by US.
-Create export driven industrial policy to climb up value chain.
-Educate population
Still viable extractive state route.
-Be authoritarian.
-Establish domestic serenity via state violence.
-Have maritime access.
-Have resources.
-Don't be sanctioned by US.
To get to upper income fast:
-Helps to have small population.
-Have access to cheap migrant labour.
Historically, start with:
-Be authoritarian.
-Establish domestic serenity via state violence.
-Have access to cheap slave labour.
- refurb 4y agoRather than “be authoritarian”, you could just say “provide stable political environment”, which would include authoritarian.