I think the biggest offender of configuration language are the unintuitively multi-tiering of same settings but for different scope with varied ordering of prec

I think the biggest offender of configuration language are the unintuitively multi-tiering of same settings but for different scope with varied ordering of precedence. I am looking at you, Postfix `main.conf` and ISC Bind9 `named.conf`. Damn near unauditable by machine code.