The intended audience for this article is pro-choice people, not the pro-life people. It's trying to start a "strategy discussion" on how to better enact certai

The intended audience for this article is pro-choice people, not the pro-life people. It's trying to start a "strategy discussion" on how to better enact certain goals. In short, he's not trying to convince any pro-lifer of anything here, he's trying to convince pro-choice people to use better arguments. And in general, I actually avoid the "soul argument" as well, even when engaging with pro-life people. First, I know several pro-life people who are not religious or even atheists, secondly I have no good arguments to counter a faith-based belief, and thirdly I think that for many religious pro-life people it's not even that important of an argument (for example many – though not all – pro-life advocates will allow room for nuance in cases of medical issues or rape).