3 ms·
The context of reselling code is copilot which is of questionable legality. They owe you a copyright header when distributing your BSD or MIT licensed code. Th
by fnord123 4y ago
The context of reselling code is copilot which is of questionable legality.
They owe you a copyright header when distributing your BSD or MIT licensed code. They owe you adhering to the GPL license when distributing your GPL licensed code.
- rglullis 4y agoThat is a separate issue, and unless they think that money would be enough to settle any license violations, it has nothing to do with donating some cash to maintainers.
- fnord123 4y agoIt's not a separate issue. It's the issue GP was referring to.
- encryptluks2 4y agoThat is exactly what I was referring to. I wonder if some people are just unfamiliar with copilot licensing issues or they don't see how that is an issue.
- rglullis 4y agoOf course the Copilot thing is problematic and they should not let be off the hook for it, but Copilot is not even referenced in the blog post. My read is that they are giving the money to projects they use to develop GitHub itself. And if this has nothing to do with the Copilot issue, why bring it to the conversation?