4 ms·
> Regardless, it's a good news/move. This is dystopic. I'm not anti-abortion but I can't think of one reason that promoting abortion is a "good move" to make a
by galfarragem 4y ago
> Regardless, it's a good news/move.
This is dystopic. I'm not anti-abortion but I can't think of one reason that promoting abortion is a "good move" to make a better society. We all know that ads work. Abortion should be a (legal) last resort solution and we already know that we have that option.
- egeozcan 4y ago> I can't think of one reason that promoting abortion is a "good move" So that people can compare their options when they do need it? So that people can see that the option does exist in the beginning? If they can promote any other medical procedure, why not this?
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- skrause 4y agoThe law was so strict that a clinic couldn't even mention in a single sentence somewhere on their website that they also provide abortions. This isn't about TV advertisement campaigns telling you to get your weekly abortion.
- MandieD 4y agoGerman doctors weren’t allowed to list terminations as one of their services, nor even write posts on their websites giving factual information about abortion, which you’d know if you’d read the article.
- schroeding 4y agoNo no no! Don't trust the "advertisement" translation of the NYT, this is german law legalese! "Werbung" does mean (a promoting) advertisement, but "Werbung" in the sense of the law can also mean any mention of something at all if you perform the same something, e.g. you are a doc and peform abortions => if you mention abortions (the word alone is already enough!), it's technically "Werbung" in the sense of the law.
- galfarragem 4y agoThanks for the clarification. Anyway I still wonder if this law is not a pandora box.
- sandworm101 4y agoIt is information about accessing a medical procedure. It isnt as if millions of women are suddenly going to realize that abortions exist and rush out to get them who otherwise would not. It just might make things a little simpler for those who were already looking for the proceedure. Women dont make such life choices according to convenience.
- lhoff 4y agoThe proposal was a bit more complex to care for the outcome you are probably worrying about. They extended another law that forbids misleading advertisement for pharmaceuticals and medical procedures to also cover abortions. The situation before the change was that everyone could publish any information's , true or false, about abortions except doctors and clinics. Now misleading information's are prohibited and doctors are alowed to inform about abortions and publicise that they perform the procedure.
- solar-ice 4y agoThe definition of “promotion” here is bad enough that simply listing abortion as a provided service at a clinic would be illegal. We do not know who provides these services, because they’re not allowed to tell us they provide these services. Nobody is about to go get an ad campaign on TV telling women to get abortions here now, buy one get one free. That’s not how the medical system here works.