4 ms·
Do the actual inventors have to go through the parent litigation process, why not report it as theft to the local authorities, and use that theft report as a pa
by polotics 4y ago
Do the actual inventors have to go through the parent litigation process, why not report it as theft to the local authorities, and use that theft report as a pass to keep working. Why is it for patents that the burden of proof is inverted?
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- xyzzy123 4y agoLook up the difference between criminal and civil law.
- encryptluks2 4y agoCivil crimes are for the rich and criminal are reserved for the poor.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- xyzzy123 4y agoThat is in a sense true. If you don't have any money to begin with, you don't have much to lose by getting sued and there is not much incentive for anyone to bother. Personally I think it's better for everyone that the police are not usually involved in the enforcement of IP law. A lot of corporations would love the state (aka taxpayers) to pick up more of the tab for keeping mickey mouse out of the hands of the public. The flip side of what the parent is asking for (the police treat "theft of ideas" like criminal theft, without even any registration of the IP!) would very likely result in clogged courts and mass incarceration of downloaders. (Admittedly this ridiculous hypothetical would also require that police have time and resource to treat theft of property seriously, which is not true in many places and considered no big deal given that you would most likely not be compensated for your losses except by insurance in any case).