4 ms·
I specially don’t use Nim for this reason. I don’t want to dedicate any mental overhead to differentiating between array access and generics. I know it makes th
by jimbob45 4y ago
I specially don’t use Nim for this reason. I don’t want to dedicate any mental overhead to differentiating between array access and generics. I know it makes the compiler engineers unhappy but I like my <T> syntax just fine and it seems to work well enough for C#.
- Gibbon1 4y agoMy thought is start using emojis for stuff like this.
- smitty1e 4y agoI was thinking, with the advent of Unicode and LSP, why not just design a language from the font up having the syntax one craves?
- Gibbon1 4y agoI think I saw someone talking about parsing and they said parsing emoji's and most non latin characters was 'easy' One would assume a parser that recognized foobaz = 5 in place of foo->bas = 5 wouldn't be a problem. Likely be far easier.
- planetis 4y ago> differentiating between array access and generics It rarely comes up for a collection of proc pointers, when calling that element directly. But it compiles fine. I code in Nim regularly and it's the least of my concerns.