4 ms·
People here are asking why Switzerland isn't investing in a much more obvious surface railway cargo system. The answer is that the current railway is already v
by jokteur 4y ago
People here are asking why Switzerland isn't investing in a much more obvious surface railway cargo system.
The answer is that the current railway is already very dense, and both passager and cargo share the same tracks. There are already plans to extend the current railway system, but because of the shared mode, it is very complicated. And also because the terrain is very expensive (there are villages everywhere) and challenging (nothing is flat here, even the middle land), this project kind of make sense.
Instead of boring big tunnels (that would be necessary to extend the current railway system) with all the safety measures, lets bore tiny tunnels where everything is automated.
- bobthepanda 4y agoAlso, they're also expanding the rail tunnels as well: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NRLA https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NRLA
- _nalply 4y agoThese projects are almost finished, some tunnels are even in operation for years. But don't worry, the Swiss have even more projects in the pipeline, planned and in construction.
- dmix 4y agoWow costs only increased by ~30% from projections in 1998 -> 2015. That would be a huge success story here in Canada (and I’m sure the US) that it didn’t go 100%+.