7 ms·

The app review process isn't QA.

• smackfu 15y ago
  OTOH The first two items on the list of app store review guidelines: 2.1 Apps that crash will be rejected 2.2 Apps that exhibit bugs will be rejected
  • sbuk 15y ago
    What would have happened had Apple rejected this app? Politically, Apple are between a rock and a hard place here. Ultimately the culpability lies with the Gmail app team and they have acknowledged this and pulled the app. https://plus.google.com/100940716892313727285/posts/4aPVQTj9jyL https://plus.google.com/100940716892313727285/posts/4aPVQTj9...
    • Kylekramer 15y ago
      There is an world of difference from rejecting an app for "duplicating functionality" and for bugs. If Apple rejected it and said they would take it once it was fixed, the only blowback would be from those who thought Apple was lying. No reason to cater to those folks. More likely, we wouldn't hear about it at all. It is indicative of a larger problem I have with the App Store. I am not a fan of requiring a review process. But once you crossed that bridge, make it a damn good and tough review process. The amount of crap that gets through is amazing. You already pissed off people who don't like apps getting Apple's approval, you might as well crack skulls and make sure there is real quality in every app.
  • sjwright 15y ago
    That doesn't mean Apple's QA will look for ways to make the app crash or bug out. It just means that if, during the course of regular testing it crashes, they'll stop testing and reject on the spot.