> Soon a local started pushing the city to get involved until it was finally condemned, as the owner didn't want to sell it to someone who would use it. I fin

> Soon a local started pushing the city to get involved until it was finally condemned, as the owner didn't want to sell it to someone who would use it. I find it a bit sad that we have a political system that so strongly protects proprietors that they can choose to let a building fall into condemnation instead of just... let people use it. Why shouldn't people be allowed to just... move into and maintain a building, if it's otherwise not used?