10 ms·
The difference is that it kills the environment by using massive amounts of electricity. That criticism is fundamental: There is no viable "web3" offering not
by ibotty 4y ago
The difference is that it kills the environment by using massive amounts of electricity. That criticism is fundamental: There is no viable "web3" offering not doing that.
- marsouin 4y agoYou are actually wrong. Proof of stake blockchains consume much less. For instance on Tezos, transactions create less CO2 than sending an email (without an attachment). The environmental impact of email is colossal, let's criticize that for a minute ;)
- rvz 4y agoYou do realise what you have just said was complete nonsense? So Algorand, Flow, Solana, Stellar, XRPL and Tezos are all killing the environment and using massive amounts of electricity? Once again, fallen into the same absolutist trap like all the other 'angry' critics who will eventually realise that they are wasting their time trying to stop all of it.