2 ms·
Or maybe it's what the wikipedia article says?
by frozenport 4y ago
Or maybe it's what the wikipedia article says?
- alexfromapex 4y agoI’m simply offering a possible underlying cause. I’m not denying it’s a real phenomenon.
- ShamelessC 4y agoYou're suggesting there's a misleading flaw in the measurement device itself which is a different phenomenon than the article describes (in which a particle's normal evolution through time _actually_ decays when measured).
- sumy23 4y agoIt's always a bit terrifying to me how often I see people on Hacker News confidently asserting some phenomenon can be explained by something that any rational person would recognize as non-nonsensical.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- alexfromapex 4y agoOne person’s terror is another person’s Appeal to the Stone.
- sumy23 4y agoReally? An entire Wikipedia article filled with detailed explanation of the phenomenon and its cause is an appeal to the stone? Really? Sorry, but that is absurd.