4 ms·
> I look at it from another angle that you might consider. With Roe, the Supreme Court granted "rights" that were not explicitly in the constitution That's an
by mcphage 4y ago
> I look at it from another angle that you might consider. With Roe, the Supreme Court granted "rights" that were not explicitly in the constitution
That's an important point, I wonder if there should be an amendment to the constitution stating that "just because we didn't mention a right, doesn't mean you don't have it". It seems important, maybe we should give it a low amendment number. I'd say top 10 at least, are there any numbers not being used?
Hmm, 9 seems to be free I guess?