> his goal is to persuade not to find the truth. I found it to be exactly the opposite. The current CC movement leaves no room for dissent. Just like the first

> his goal is to persuade not to find the truth. I found it to be exactly the opposite. The current CC movement leaves no room for dissent. Just like the first year of COVID where we left no room to listen to credible scientists, CC movement is singularly focused often ignoring inconvenient truths. > Look at your repeating the phrases "deranged", "lunatics" I mean, I wasn't calling you mentally ill, but there are people that with close approximation resemble precisely someone that has no logical basis and has taken on a religious pro or anti CC agenda. Watch Fox news sometimes and you'll get what I mean. Alex is quite the opposite, but your first instinct was to smear his character by aligning it with Peter Thiel. Bad faith arguments start with ad-hominem attacks on the person's motives instead of the content of the argument. You kind of did the same thing with me by criticizing my language instead of engaging in arguments, just one step shy of a false moral superiority card (you're insulting mentally ill people). Most NYT reporters that invest in propelling Climate catastrophe agenda are not scientists either.