2 ms·
I don't know where this method of argumentation came from, but it's obnoxious and I'm over it. There are even soyjaks for this. Either you don't know and you're
by kcl 4y ago
I don't know where this method of argumentation came from, but it's obnoxious and I'm over it. There are even soyjaks for this. Either you don't know and you're being lazy (I don't think this is the case), or you do know and you've generated an asymmetric work request for op that you could've answered and that left unanswered by him casts doubt on his argument. If you have a case to make, make it, instead of this nonsense DoS attack. This is not a defense of op's position.
- sumy23 4y agoYour outrage is unwarranted. The proposed changes are: 1) Limiting PFOF because it creates possible conflicts of interest. 2) Limiting "gamification" of trading via engagement prompts. 3) Adding sub-penny prices to exchanges to harmonize them with market makers. This is to encourage more orders to be sent to exchanges instead of market makers. How are any of these things capitulating to institutional investors?
- Hasu 4y agoWhich "argument method", asking questions to gain a further understanding of a position both for yourself and the person you're asking? I'm pretty sure that it came from Socrates.