3 ms·
Hasn't "broken windows"[1] been debunked? Isn't this that bunk? This is pure cop-aganda garbage. [1] https://phys.org/news/2019-05-evidence-broken-windows-th
by drewcoo 4y ago
Hasn't "broken windows"[1] been debunked?
Isn't this that bunk?
This is pure cop-aganda garbage.
[1] https://phys.org/news/2019-05-evidence-broken-windows-theory-neighborhood.html https://phys.org/news/2019-05-evidence-broken-windows-theory...
- lupire 4y ago"broken windows policing" is when you claim to do the stuff in the article, but actually just harass residents.
- jimmygrapes 4y agoI haven't read the original meta-analyses in full, but I often hear it parroted that "the broken window theory is debunked". Based on what I have read about this so-called debunking, I am far from convinced. Maybe I just don't understand the actual claims on either side. The way I understood the original idea is that when something is in a continuous state of disrepair, two things happen: the effort to repair it decreases, and more disrepair follows. A knock-on effect of disrepair is that the perception of value decreases, which can spiral into lowered socio-economic standing in that region... and AFAIK there's little argument about whether low socio-economic status is an important factor for potential criminal behavior (just argument about why and what specific behavior). I get the feeling the debunking of the theory is misinterpreted by many to mean "broken places don't cause broken people, if anything it's the other way around" which may in fact be true but is missing a lot of nuance.