3 ms·
I have a whole Twitter thread on that, here: https://twitter.com/no_identd/status/1220913617408864257 https://twitter.com/no_identd/status/1220913617408864257
by no_identd 4y ago
I have a whole Twitter thread on that, here:
https://twitter.com/no_identd/status/1220913617408864257 https://twitter.com/no_identd/status/1220913617408864257
Prompted by my discovery of this book:
https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-10756-7 https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-10756-7 "A Math-Based Writing System for Engineers: Sentence Algebra & Document Algorithms", by Brad Henderson
Edit:
Altmetrics just revealed to me that apparently a cheesy corporate marketing video for it exists:
https://youtu.be/X9vQoadsQ1I https://youtu.be/X9vQoadsQ1I
Amazing.
- gnuvince 4y agoHaven't read it, but my reaction to the 2 minute video is "excrement" [1]. [1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjHORRHXtyI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjHORRHXtyI
- no_identd 4y agoWell, yes, but tell that to the proof assistants, automated theorem provers, academic snowclone^W^H phrasal template banks, and highly bullet pointed lists of Corporate ISO9000 series GRC Policy & Procedure Work Instruction Drafting Style Guide Manual Template Files as well as the resulting legislative outputs( via lobbying, lol). Cf. my points in the Twitter thread, on proforms, thematic relations, and one anaphora¹. There exist only so many ways in which to formally answer arbitrary instances of the 7 fundamental questions (yes, 7, not 5—or six, like IBM's Zachman framework would have one believe.). ¹ the Dalai Lama walks into a pizza place and asks: Can you make me one with everything?