??? I have to imagine you've misread the thread and think that I'm saying states should be able to unilaterally restrict minority interests. I'm actually argui

??? I have to imagine you've misread the thread and think that I'm saying states should be able to unilaterally restrict minority interests. I'm actually arguing against someone who made that argument. > > If voters in a state don't want interracial marriage to be legal, should people outside the state have a say? > Yes. if you even have to ask... That's called a rhetorical question. Person I replied to said that majority of people in a state should determine if abortion is legal. I say that the purpose of the judiciary and a well-crafted representative democracy doesn't just allow the majority of the people of a state to run roughshod over an unpopular minority-- whether that minority wants to be trans, have interracial marriage, or get an abortion.