4 ms·
I definitely agree copilot isn't understanding the problem space of your code. But I also don't believe it's simply remixing code samples from its training set.
by cdrini 4y ago
I definitely agree copilot isn't understanding the problem space of your code. But I also don't believe it's simply remixing code samples from its training set. It's somewhere in between. I don't know the internals, but it looks to me like it's operating at a few layers of abstraction over literal code and syntax. It find patterns in the relationships between symbols and references. Not to mention since it's GPT-3 based, it's cross referencing the "meaning" in these abstract relationships with the meaning of plain English text written in comments, too. These pieces are similar to humans. Just like a human, copilot doesn't have a ton of exact literal code in its model. It's seen lots of code and has patterns and relationships in its model. That's why just like a human, it can translate ideas between different coding languages -- my guess would be it can write an algorithm its seen in C in F# even if its never seen that algorithm in F#; but that's hard to prove. Just like a human though, it might have some literal snippets, though. It can definitely translate between languages ; I've done that a few times. (It can even translate human languages eg English to French! I've done that sometimes for fun) I would highly recommend giving the trial version a go, if only to better understand how it works. Whether it "understands" eg a map operation... That's hard to prove. Can you think of any experiments? I think it understand the relationship between the English word map and the code patterns often associated with that word.
I think your example is close. Copilot is a lot like an inexperienced developer. It doesn't (usually) make syntax errors, but because it doesn't understand your problem space, and because it doesn't have as many layers of abstraction as a human does, it does sometimes make silly mistakes. I definitely wouldn't trust it to write an entire program on its own! But with a human in the loop doing the more complicated abstract pieces of coding, it handles the more simple menial pieces pretty well!
- simion314 4y agoIf you have access to it maybe experiment with using snippets from Windows code, like find Wine or Windows code on GitHub and copy the start of a function that is pretty unique , see if it completes it as the original or not. Other experiment maybe test if it just repeats text that iot seen and has realy no idea about stiuff. I would use missleading variables, like int namesLis; int[] counter; string i ="test"; add some comments or unrelated stuff here like print heelo world 12 times then start with for( int ... and see it it just completes it correctly or will do something stupid and have 3 or more error) If it is a bit smart it will know what variable is the list because it associated the [] with a list
- cdrini 4y agoOh as of this week copilot is open to the public: https://github.com/features/copilot/ https://github.com/features/copilot/ . You can get a trial, or it is free for students and open source maintainers.