>I also think it’s pretty clear that, when one side believes abortion to be a totally unrestricted right despite never appearing in the constitution The Suprem

>I also think it’s pretty clear that, when one side believes abortion to be a totally unrestricted right despite never appearing in the constitution The Supreme Court ruling on the Constitutionality of laws isn’t in the Constitution. You’re describing a judicial philosophy (textualism) as if it were law, or some sacred edict from above. It’s not. You’re pretending the “democratic process” isn’t broken. It is. Remember: the legislature could have banned abortion outright, at any time. We didn’t need the courts to do that. It would just take an amendment to the Constitution. Remember: a majority of people in the US want abortion to be legal. The court overruled that based on its own fetish for textualism. It’s great that you want people to talk to each other. In the mean time, women will die.