6 ms·
Frozen baby woolly mammoth discovered in Yukon gold fields
- rdtennent 4y agoFossilized, not frozen.
- galago 4y agoNot a fossil, mummified and/or preserved by cold or ground conditions. That's actual tissue.
- jessriedel 4y agoWikipedia says > A fossil is any preserved remains, impression, or trace of any once-living thing from a past geological age. So tissue still qualifies. If someone says its not a fossil, that would presumably be because its not old enough (not a “past age”). Also, I am pretty sure it wasn’t frozen when discovered since it was near the surface at a time when they were getting rain. Might have been in permafrost until they started excavating though.
- xeromal 4y agoI feel like this is bordering a bit pendantic even if it's techincally correct. I think most laymen would understand fossilized as rock, hard material even if that's incorrect.
- aksss 4y agohttps://www.thoughtco.com/fossilized-or-petrified-1438948#:~:text=This%20means%20that%20out%20of,the%20word%20%22petrified%22%20much https://www.thoughtco.com/fossilized-or-petrified-1438948#:~.... What's the difference between fossilized and petrified? It can be a little confusing. A fossil is any evidence of life that has been preserved in rock. Fossils include not just organisms themselves, but also the burrows, marks, and footprints they left behind. Fossilization is the name for a number of processes that produce fossils. One of those processes is mineral replacement. This is common in sedimentary and some metamorphic rocks, where a mineral grain may be replaced by a material with a different composition, but still preserving the original shape. What Makes It Petrified? When a fossil organism is subjected to mineral replacement, it is said to be petrified. For example, petrified wood may be replaced with chalcedony, or shells replaced with pyrite. This means that out of all fossils, only the creature itself could be fossilized by petrification. And not all fossil organisms are petrified. Some are preserved as carbonized films, or preserved unchanged like recent fossil shells, or fixed in amber like fossil insects.
- Geee 4y agoMammoths aren't that old. The last one died apparently about 4000 years ago.
- koheripbal 4y agoThe article specifically says it is NOT fossilized
- iamben 4y agoDiscussion yesterday: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31877772 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31877772
- OJFord 4y ago> A perfect storm of events has led to a once-in-a-lifetime discovery for a gold miner, a First Nation, a veteran paleontologist and a territory. Saying 'a First Nation' like that is equivalent to saying 'a female' - which people also mistakenly say - or 'a British', which nobody would say. 'Canadian' happens to be both adjective and (proper) noun; that doesn't mean everything is, eh.
- lolinder 4y agoThis use of "a First Nation" is meant to refer to the group of people, not an individual. I believe it's equivalent to saying in the US "a Native American tribe". EDIT: see https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Nations_in_Canada https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Nations_in_Canada > Some indigenous peoples in Canada have also adopted the term First Nation to replace the word "band" in the formal name of their community.
- OJFord 4y agoThen why 'a'? It still seems wrong to me, like (but opposite) 'woman police officer', it should surely be 'a First Nation people' or something? To use your example, it sounds to me like 'a Native'. 'Native what?' I'm left wondering as a reader. Perhaps I'm wrong, I'm not Canadian, nor 'a First Nation', it just doesn't scan to me.
- stormbrew 4y agoIt parses a little ambiguous or odd to me but not wrong. It's the Tr'ondëk Hwëch'in First Nation, one of many First Nations in Canada. The analogous word you might be reaching for would probably be tribe or band, and neither "a tribe" or "a band" read weird to me at all. Within the Canadian legal framework, the treaties between Canada and its indigenous population are at least theoretically between distinct "nations".
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- jfengel 4y agoI take it these are fields where precious metals are sought, as opposed to potatoes. I suppose you don't grow potatoes in frozen ground, but that was my first reading of this.
- formvoltron 4y agoSomebody tell George Church.
- dlevine 4y agoSomething I haven't seen mentioned but am curious about is whether this discovery was facilitated by global warming.
- astrea 4y ago> a young miner working in Yukon's Eureka Creek, south of Dawson City, was digging up muck using a front end loader when he struck something. Looking for things in the ground usually turns up things in the ground
- xwdv 4y agoSo is this mammoth well preserved enough for us to Jurassic Park this species or is it the same story of DNA being too far decayed.