3 ms·
This extends so much further than just GitHub and open source. Almost all “AI” based generative tools are trained on public datasets, in some cases they have li
by samwillis 4y ago
This extends so much further than just GitHub and open source. Almost all “AI” based generative tools are trained on public datasets, in some cases they have licensed these datasets, but my understanding is that they are often just trained on the “public” internet. There is currently clear legal protection of scraping, however you can’t “republish” that data, only significant derivative work. I don’t know if these tools fall into that category - IANAL - but that’s the billion dollar question. The text/language and image generation are all capable of outputting results that are clearly based on particular input imagery.
This is such an important debate to have and my fear is that the companies investing in this tech have deep pockets, the lobbying around it could result in a unbalanced outcome. This isn’t really an area where “move fast and break things” is necessarily the right process.
Exciting though to see where this technology could lead, co-pilot blows my mind at times.
- leereeves 4y agoAt some point image generation tools will be good enough to create recognizable images of Disney and Marvel characters, and the legal question will become very important in Washington. But what we mere citizens have to say about it, I fear, won't matter much.
- CrazyStat 4y ago>At some point image generation tools will be good enough to create recognizable images of Disney and Marvel characters They already are. Even Dall-E mini does a respectable job at cartoon characters (it struggles a lot with people, especially faces, but handles cartoons quite well).
- cdrini 4y agoSome examples of Dallee generating characters of Homer Simpson: https://twitter.com/Dalle2Pics/status/1534718838377529344 https://twitter.com/Dalle2Pics/status/1534718838377529344