> If your code is released with no license, it should be fair to assume free use. Legally? The opposite is true. Source-available is not open source, and is em

> If your code is released with no license, it should be fair to assume free use. Legally? The opposite is true. Source-available is not open source, and is emphatically not public domain. There's a reason that StackOverflow and all the other code bins have legal agreements that you are notified of when using them.