4 ms·
It could be argued either way, since in this case the tool does a lot more more than a content aware fill. If I were to ask you to draw a rabbit, you'd own the
by jfim 4y ago
It could be argued either way, since in this case the tool does a lot more more than a content aware fill.
If I were to ask you to draw a rabbit, you'd own the copyright on the picture despite me giving you the prompt.
In the case where a neural net is given the prompt, who owns the copyright? The prompter, the neural net, or the creator of the neural net?
- shakna 4y agoCommonly, the for-hire aspects of the copyright laws would come into play. If you have a prestanding relationship, and receive a benefit from the prompter, then the prompter is often the owner of the copyright in the US, despite not being the creator. A neural net's existence might be considered as a benefit in that case, so you don't need to dive into possible personship before establishing the owner.