Abortion rights are a huge deal. But, as to your other argument, Google is a global company, headquartered in the US. I'm not sure if a majority of its employ

Abortion rights are a huge deal. But, as to your other argument, Google is a global company, headquartered in the US. I'm not sure if a majority of its employees are in the US these days. I think you may be misinterpreting the GP as raising a whataboutism-like argument. I think they're saying "Yes, and also" instead of "No, instead". I realize many times bringing up unrelated problems is used to make "No, instead" arguments, but I don't think that's where the GP is going. I think they're applauding Google, and trying to use embarrassment to push for more broad actions on Google's part.