4 ms·
Here you go: https://www.findlaw.com/family/reproductive-rights/griswold-v-connecticut-and-the-right-to-contraceptives.html https://www.findlaw.com/family/repro
by mch82 4y ago
Here you go: https://www.findlaw.com/family/reproductive-rights/griswold-v-connecticut-and-the-right-to-contraceptives.html https://www.findlaw.com/family/reproductive-rights/griswold-...
> At the time, a Connecticut law prohibited the use of "any drug, medicinal article or instrument for the purpose of preventing conception" and punished anyone who "assists, abets, counsels, causes, hires or commands another" to do so (in other words, it wasn't a crime to sell birth control devices, but it was a crime to use birth control or any drug or medical instrument for the purposes of preventing conception).
> Griswold and Buxton sued the State of Connecticut claiming the law violated their constitutional rights. The issue at stake was whether a married couple had a constitutional "right of privacy" to be counseled in the use of contraceptives.
Three other major cases are cited in that FindLaw article, the most recent in 2014 which took away rights to healthcare coverage.
- imgabe 4y agoThe "at the time" was 1965. Contraception was new and controversial 50 years ago. It's not anymore and is widely supported. Is there any current law or proposal to outlaw contraception? Such a law would be wildly unpopular, even among most pro-life people.
- vkou 4y ago> It's not anymore and is widely supported. So is abortion, and yet, it's 2022, and the leopards are eating our faces.
- danachow 4y ago
- seamusthecrab 4y ago
- imgabe 4y agoI never claimed I was a lawyer. All that law does is revise the definition of "unborn person" in this law: https://www.legis.la.gov/Legis/Law.aspx?d=78337 https://www.legis.la.gov/Legis/Law.aspx?d=78337 which lists specific crimes, none of which are contraception or IVF. The words "contraception" or "IVF" are not mentioned anywhere in either law.