> But, the Supreme Court should not be responsible for managing dysfunction in other branches of govt. This is the only statement in your take that I disagree

> But, the Supreme Court should not be responsible for managing dysfunction in other branches of govt. This is the only statement in your take that I disagree with. In the checks and balances system, the supreme court is exactly supposed to protect the balance between federal, state, and individual rights. One consistent court might have protected gun rights and abortion rights this week. Another might have permitted restrictions on both. Instead we got gun rights and body control. The apolitical ship has sailed.