6 ms·

Is it possible to avoid a flame war at this point? I believe this arricle is way too inflammatory, political and uninteresting for this forum.

• aaomidi 4y ago
  You could for example, avoid the article and go comment on the ones you find more interesting. This is a serious issue and these articles are important. If anything they put pressure on more companies.
• JKCalhoun 4y ago
  If we only posted articles lacking in controversy that would be uninteresting.
  • HKH2 4y ago
    Nope. There are plenty of challenging problems that are not controversial, and disagreements can be dealt with amicably. You can have friendly opponents/competitors.
• deleted 4y ago
  [deleted]
• DonHopkins 4y ago
  • roflyear 4y ago
    Eh I guess that's kinda what they did.
    • DonHopkins 4y ago
      No, it's not what they did, quite the opposite. Their account is almost two years old, yet that was their first post ever. What they should have done was to continue to not post telling other people what they should not discuss. They were doing just fine for almost two years not commenting on discussions they were not interested in or telling people what not to talk about, and they should have continued that trend instead of spoiling it. It's always the ones who have reprehensible unjustifiable politics they don't want to discuss, who can't tolerate other people discussing politics.
• wonnage 4y ago
  Apparently supporting basic human rights is too political now
  • Quillbert182 4y ago
    Yes, the right to life is apparently quite controversial.
    • colinsane 4y ago
      as is the right to consent. i never agreed to be brought into this world, i’ll have you know. man holding a butterfly: is this <flaming>?
• stjohnswarts 4y ago
  Aren't you free to not read the comments?