4 ms·
-5.75 is pretty awful vision, so I can understand the desire. We likely could have fixed that naturally through changing your habits, getting you more accurate
by goldenkey 4y ago
-5.75 is pretty awful vision, so I can understand the desire. We likely could have fixed that naturally through changing your habits, getting you more accurate scripts, and 3+ activity-specific scripts. I discuss in my comment, how most folks don't really have genetically bad vision but rather persistent biological compensations that can be ameliorated. But sure, if you were looking for a quick fix that doesn't last, I suppose it's effective and I don't demean you for your choices.
- feintruled 4y agoI'd love to believe it could have been fixed naturally, at the time that branch of treatment all seemed woo-woo, be fascinated to hear if there is any hard evidence for it working now. But anyway, sorry for the previous sharp reply. It wasn't warranted.